This entry was posted on
Sunday, February 7th, 2010 at
6:18 pm and is filed under
Takamine Guitars .
You can follow any responses to this entry through the
RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
yes all original there… check out the rest of the vids I have posted… there are some more originals if you liked that first one… =) THANKS for the comment!
Right on… serves a good purpose… keeps the HEART of the guitar as WHOLE as possible! – that’s what drew me to them in the first place… ya… aesthetics are definitely a “subjective” thing… I kinda liked the “arch-top” look actually… but would be a little cumbersome to clean around and I didn’t try changing strings on it either so… don’t know about that either…
Playability is RIGHT UP THERE with the McPhersons.. maybe a little quicker on the attack response… but sustain and tone… they are pretty close… a REAL comparison would have to have SIMILAR wood on the 2 guitars and SAME electronics… but BOTH are FANTASTIC GUITARS! =)
Not as asthetically pleasing as the Mcpherson. Even though it serves a good purpose, I don’t like the look of the bulky mechanism on the back of the guitar that the strings attach to.
Looks cool, but I’m not too sure how I feel about there being no soundhole on the front because I like to play with a thumb pick and sometimes when I’m playing percussively and closer to the bridge the pick hit’s the part of the guitar between the soundhole and the bridge. I guess i’d be fine if the strings were high enough to the point where that didn’t happen because I’d kill myself if I had such a beautiful guitar and made a bunch of dents where the sound hole should be.
February 7th, 2010 at 7:11 pm
yes all original there… check out the rest of the vids I have posted… there are some more originals if you liked that first one… =) THANKS for the comment!
February 7th, 2010 at 7:49 pm
Right on… serves a good purpose… keeps the HEART of the guitar as WHOLE as possible! – that’s what drew me to them in the first place… ya… aesthetics are definitely a “subjective” thing… I kinda liked the “arch-top” look actually… but would be a little cumbersome to clean around and I didn’t try changing strings on it either so… don’t know about that either…
February 7th, 2010 at 8:37 pm
Playability is RIGHT UP THERE with the McPhersons.. maybe a little quicker on the attack response… but sustain and tone… they are pretty close… a REAL comparison would have to have SIMILAR wood on the 2 guitars and SAME electronics… but BOTH are FANTASTIC GUITARS! =)
February 7th, 2010 at 9:14 pm
Did you write that 1st piece you played? that was tremendous!
February 7th, 2010 at 9:27 pm
Not as asthetically pleasing as the Mcpherson. Even though it serves a good purpose, I don’t like the look of the bulky mechanism on the back of the guitar that the strings attach to.
February 7th, 2010 at 9:54 pm
Very nice mellow sounding guitar when fingerpicking. How is the playability compared to a Mcpherson? They are both very good sounding guitars.
February 7th, 2010 at 9:58 pm
GOOD POINT!
February 7th, 2010 at 10:09 pm
Looks cool, but I’m not too sure how I feel about there being no soundhole on the front because I like to play with a thumb pick and sometimes when I’m playing percussively and closer to the bridge the pick hit’s the part of the guitar between the soundhole and the bridge. I guess i’d be fine if the strings were high enough to the point where that didn’t happen because I’d kill myself if I had such a beautiful guitar and made a bunch of dents where the sound hole should be.
February 7th, 2010 at 10:22 pm
nice!
February 7th, 2010 at 10:45 pm
DO IT- HAMMA DOWN!
February 7th, 2010 at 10:50 pm
wow. you make me want to practice more.
February 7th, 2010 at 11:03 pm
Thanks! – LOVE your collection of singer songwriters! (I Sub’d=)
February 7th, 2010 at 11:22 pm
Had a feeling you are quite the master player … nice demo and that Batson sounds fab in your hands.
February 8th, 2010 at 12:15 am
YAY, Its up! It sounds good and uploaded well. Lets keepem comin! Yer AWESOME! =)
February 8th, 2010 at 12:28 am
Lee’s the Pres?
Yer awsome Thanks a bunch it’s always good to hear you stuff.