yes all original there… check out the rest of the vids I have posted… there are some more originals if you liked that first one… =) THANKS for the comment!
Right on… serves a good purpose… keeps the HEART of the guitar as WHOLE as possible! – that’s what drew me to them in the first place… ya… aesthetics are definitely a “subjective” thing… I kinda liked the “arch-top” look actually… but would be a little cumbersome to clean around and I didn’t try changing strings on it either so… don’t know about that either…
Playability is RIGHT UP THERE with the McPhersons.. maybe a little quicker on the attack response… but sustain and tone… they are pretty close… a REAL comparison would have to have SIMILAR wood on the 2 guitars and SAME electronics… but BOTH are FANTASTIC GUITARS! =)
Not as asthetically pleasing as the Mcpherson. Even though it serves a good purpose, I don’t like the look of the bulky mechanism on the back of the guitar that the strings attach to.
Looks cool, but I’m not too sure how I feel about there being no soundhole on the front because I like to play with a thumb pick and sometimes when I’m playing percussively and closer to the bridge the pick hit’s the part of the guitar between the soundhole and the bridge. I guess i’d be fine if the strings were high enough to the point where that didn’t happen because I’d kill myself if I had such a beautiful guitar and made a bunch of dents where the sound hole should be.
{ 15 comments… read them below or add one }
yes all original there… check out the rest of the vids I have posted… there are some more originals if you liked that first one… =) THANKS for the comment!
Right on… serves a good purpose… keeps the HEART of the guitar as WHOLE as possible! – that’s what drew me to them in the first place… ya… aesthetics are definitely a “subjective” thing… I kinda liked the “arch-top” look actually… but would be a little cumbersome to clean around and I didn’t try changing strings on it either so… don’t know about that either…
Playability is RIGHT UP THERE with the McPhersons.. maybe a little quicker on the attack response… but sustain and tone… they are pretty close… a REAL comparison would have to have SIMILAR wood on the 2 guitars and SAME electronics… but BOTH are FANTASTIC GUITARS! =)
Did you write that 1st piece you played? that was tremendous!
Not as asthetically pleasing as the Mcpherson. Even though it serves a good purpose, I don’t like the look of the bulky mechanism on the back of the guitar that the strings attach to.
Very nice mellow sounding guitar when fingerpicking. How is the playability compared to a Mcpherson? They are both very good sounding guitars.
GOOD POINT!
Looks cool, but I’m not too sure how I feel about there being no soundhole on the front because I like to play with a thumb pick and sometimes when I’m playing percussively and closer to the bridge the pick hit’s the part of the guitar between the soundhole and the bridge. I guess i’d be fine if the strings were high enough to the point where that didn’t happen because I’d kill myself if I had such a beautiful guitar and made a bunch of dents where the sound hole should be.
nice!
DO IT- HAMMA DOWN!
wow. you make me want to practice more.
Thanks! – LOVE your collection of singer songwriters! (I Sub’d=)
Had a feeling you are quite the master player … nice demo and that Batson sounds fab in your hands.
YAY, Its up! It sounds good and uploaded well. Lets keepem comin! Yer AWESOME! =)
Lee’s the Pres?
Yer awsome Thanks a bunch it’s always good to hear you stuff.